It is no longer a requirement for mothers to name the father of their children on birth certificates. This requirement is highly contrast the traditionalist style law that Labor introduced forcing mothers to place the fathers name on the birth certificate or face a fine.
The revolutionary amendment had been extensively criticised as being a form of social engineering. Women could possibly use this as an opportunity as stopping the child from seeing their humble roots,
However, the news was embraced by groups who felt that the previous law was an extensive measure of the 'nanny state' we currently live in. As well as it being a law that may harm vulnerable women.Will fathers names on birth certificate become a thing of the past?
Does a child not knowing their father effect them significantly?
No Response to "Fatherless Birth Certificates are a choice"
Post a Comment
All comments and questions are welcome. The whole point of this blog is to find out the publics opinions a views. Please remember keep it clean or I will be forced to remove your comment. :)